Thank you for your support of the Fair Tax (HR 25) and (S 296). We are continuing to work for a Fair Tax model for Minnesota.

Dennis Madden
State Director (volunteer)

The result: A blizzard of new tax forms that the Internal Revenue Service will begin rolling out next year.

“It was actually something that we were following back under the Bush administration under the 2008 budget — we started to see these kinds of rumblings about the ‘tax gap’ and whether or not businesses were paying their fair share,” says Tom Henschke, president of the Pennsylvania-based SMC Business Councils, which was one of the first organizations to call attention to the health care amendment when it was introduced last fall. “So two administrations can claim credit for this.”

The first tax-reporting expansion was buried in a different bill, the Housing Assistance Tax Act introduced by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and signed into law by President George W. Bush in July 2008. Best known for its first-time homebuyers’ credit, the bill also created a new addition to the family of 1099 tax forms: the 1099-K.

The 1099 is a catch-all series of IRS documents used to report non-wage income from a variety of sources like contract work, dividends, earned interest and pension distributions. The new 1099-K aims to shine a light on a currently hard-to-track payment stream: credit cards. Starting in 2011, financial firms that process credit or debit card payments will be required to send their clients, and the IRS, an annual form documenting the year’s transactions.

The rule comes with a floor to weed out the most casual retailers: The 1099-K is only required when a merchant has at least 200 payment transactions a year totaling more than $20,000. But it applies to all payment processors, including Paypal, Amazon.com, and others that service very small businesses.

The goal of the new regulations is to catch income that is going unreported to the IRS. The federal government loses an estimated $300 billion each year from the “tax gap” between what individuals and businesses owe and what they actually pay.

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Now comes Bank of America about to tell Congress the same thing:

Bank of America’s top mortgage executive, testifying today before Congress, will release sobering details of home-loan delinquencies, including that “hundreds of thousands of customers” haven’t made a payment in more than a year.

And, to put a number on it…

Almost 500,000 struggling loan customers have not supplied information or taken other basic steps to qualify for mortgage help. About half of them have not made a payment for more than a year, or owe more than 50 percent of the value of their homes.

That’s because those 500,000 lied about their income, assets or both when they applied for the loan originally, and that deception would be discovered.

But this also means that some 250,000 of those customers have not made a payment in a year.

If we presume that these people have average mortgage payments of $1,000 a month (and this number is probably low), this amounts to $250 million monthly that is being spent in the economy but would otherwise go to mortgage payments.

Read the entire article here.

O’Gara’s Bar and Restaurant

164 Snelling Ave. N., St. Paul

After you send the government your hard earned money, come join  The Winona Tea Party Patriots for hot dogs, music and more.

FOR MORE INFO:

WinonaTeaPartyPatriots@live.com

“If we divide the 2001 net tax gap estimate of $255 billion by 130 million individual taxpayers, we can see that each of those taxpayers in 2001 paid, on average, an extra $2,000 to subsidize the unwillingness or inability of some taxpayers to pay their fair share.”

In 2001 the average taxpayer paid $8,265 in taxes. With an estimated tax gap – which is the difference between what taxpayers should pay and what they actually pay on a timely basis – of $345 billion, this means that the 130 million taxpayers paid on average $2,649 more in taxes to subsidize the unwillingness or inability of some taxpayers to pay their fair share.

In other words, if everyone paid the taxes they owed, average individual income taxes paid per taxpayer could have been 32.1 percent less.

Click to view the entire What the federal tax system is costing you – besides your taxes! Tax compliance facts white paper.

This is your chance to join a peaceful demonstration to express your displeasure at both the National and State burdens which we now shoulder and will be increased, upon us. Your chance to let your representatives know in both D.C. and Minnesota, we have had enough and are very unhappy at how they are not listing to the very people who elected them to their positions, and can un-elect them also.

Come join your neighbors at the MN Capitol grounds on April 15 commencing at 5:PM to 9:PM. There is a lineup of speakers who are Conservatives with a message. Meet your neighbors of like morals and views and visit the many booths where you may learn how you can get active and help in the struggle to send our Representatives the message of smaller government, lower taxes and a business culture that grows entrepreneurship and jobs jobs jobs. And it will take all of us to do this job and, If you don’t get active or help in the struggle, you will have no right to criticize the results. Sooooo, Put the date on your calendar, gather a neighbor ot two and get to the event on April 15 at the Capitol. It is your future too that is being affected by what is going on in Government today.

Any while there, be sure and stop by the FAIR TAX 4 MN booth and say Hello. We have a member of our group on the Speaker’s schedule. Learn more about how the Fair Tax can be a part of Minnesota tax policies. Our goal is to make April 15, just another spring day by not being required to file either State or National taxes.

Minnesota Congress

1st DISTRICT: TIM WALZ

2nd DISTRICT: JOHN KLINE

3rd DISTRICT: ERIK PAULSEN

4th DISTRICT: BETTY MC COLLUM

5th DISTRICT: KEITH ELLISON

6th DISTRICT: MICHELE BACHMAN

7th DISTRICT: COLIN PETERSON

8th DISTRICT: JIM OBERSTAR

Minnesota Senators

AMY KLOBUCHAR

AL FRANKEN

Over last year there has been a re-awakening of the American tradition of the citizen’s voice in politics and public policy. From coast to coast and in every state people have come together to demand a better government—and a real voice in our government’s policies and practices. There is real and legitimate anger that the entrenched political class has served itself, mislead us and ignored the will of the people. No more.

What is extraordinary is that the Tea Party movement has not been organized by any one political figure, party or campaign operative. These are spontaneous local flowerings of a true grass roots sentiment that we’re in deep trouble as a nation and it won’t get better until we eclipse the self-serving, dishonest and destructive power of those who are bankrupting the nation and treating citizens as nothing more than sheep who can be ever more efficiently sheared.

In Massachusetts and indeed in every state politicians, campaign managers, political experts and pundits have been struck dumb, bewildered by this healthy turn toward a government “of, by and for the people.” Everywhere politicians turn they are seeing that the power of incumbency will be no protection from voters angry that they have been failed by political insiders. This justified anger is, however, often general, unfocused and without specific purpose but the on-line tax revolt is open to all and puts purpose to passion.

Read more about how it will work on the FairTax website.

Visit the Online Tax Revolt website.

HAVING in the three last numbers taken a summary review of the principal circumstances and events which have depicted the genius and fate of other confederate governments, I shall now proceed in the enumeration of the most important of those defects which have hitherto disappointed our hopes from the system established among ourselves. To form a safe and satisfactory judgment of the proper remedy, it is absolutely necessary that we should be well acquainted with the extent and malignity of the disease.

. . . There is no method of steering clear of this inconvenience, but by authorizing the national government to raise its own revenues in its own way. Imposts, excises, and, in general, all duties upon articles of consumption, may be compared to a fluid, which will, in time, find its level with the means of paying them. The amount to be contributed by each citizen will in a degree be at his own option, and can be regulated by an attention to his resources. The rich may be extravagant, the poor can be frugal; and private oppression may always be avoided by a judicious selection of objects proper for such impositions. If inequalities should arise in some States from duties on particular objects, these will, in all probability, be counterbalanced by proportional inequalities in other States, from the duties on other objects. In the course of time and things, an equilibrium, as far as it is attainable in so complicated a subject, will be established everywhere. Or, if inequalities should still exist, they would neither be so great in their degree, so uniform in their operation, nor so odious in their appearance, as those which would necessarily spring from quotas, upon any scale that can possibly be devised.

It is a signal advantage of taxes on articles of consumption, that they contain in their own nature a security against excess. They prescribe their own limit; which cannot be exceeded without defeating the end proposed, that is, an extension of the revenue.

By Alexander Hamilton
for the Independent Journal

The Entire Federalist No. 21 Paper (PDF)